Glottography and semasiography

Glottography is the recording of language-based utterances. To be more precise: the recording of the vocal cords during respiration and phonation—the production of vocal sounds and especially speech [1]. In the context of physics and anatomy, the term recording here refers to the measurement and study of such audible expressions. Linguistically, it refers to the fixation of uttered sounds in the form of symbols or characters, defining a writing system.

In principle, a writing system can be derived from glottographic and non-glottographic origins of symbols or characters [2]. In the latter case, no relation between symbols and sounds is evident. Such a writing system is called semasiographic, formerly ideographic [3]. In semasiography, symbols are constructed by humans who agree upon their meaning. The international road sign system and the ancient quipu of Inca Peru—connected, color-coded cords with tied knots—are examples [4].

The distinction between glottographic and semasiographic writing systems has clearly been made by the British linguist Geoffrey Sampson [3-5]. Michael Coe argues that writing systems are primarily glottographic, but that some degree of semasiography plays a part in all known writing [4]. In his fascinating story of the understanding and decipherment of Maya inscriptions and texts, he emphasizes phoneticism—the glottographic concept—to successfully break hieroglyphic codes based on a once spoken language.   

Keywords: linguistics, typology of writing systems.

References and more to explore
[1] The Free Dictionary: glottography [medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/glottography].
[2] Malcolm D. Hyman: Of Glyphs and Glottography. DRAFT 2006-04-01, to appear in Language & Communication [archimedes.fas.harvard.edu/mdh/glottography.pdf].
[3] Geoffrey Sampson: Writing Systems [www.icosilune.com/2009/01/geoffrey-sampson-writing-systems].
[4] Michael D. Coe: Breaking the Maya Code. Thames & Hudson, New York, Revised Edition 1999; page 18 and others.
[5] Writing Systems by Geoffrey Sampson [www.grsampson.net/BWSys.html].

The word “hieroglyph” means sacred carving

The Greek word hieroglyph originally meant sacred carving or holy carving [1-3]. This noun is now synonymous with logograph: a single written (carved, painted or otherwise displayed) symbol. A hieroglyphic depiction may represent a person, an animal, a plant, a tool or some other object. Often untied from meaning, a hieroglyph stands for a sound or sequence of sounds belonging to the spoken language of a civilization that uses hieroglyphs in their language-based writing system. Hieroglyphs can stand by themselves, but typically compose inscriptions and scripts.

The terms hieroglyph and hieroglyphic go back to the fourth century A.D., when Horapollon, also referred to as Horapollo and Horus Apollus, associated them with Egyptian writing [3,4]. The Hieroglyphics (Hieroglyphica of Horapollo) influenced hieroglyphic decipherment.

Renaissance humanists such as the Jesuit polymath Athanasius Kircher (1602-1680) enthusiastically read the Hieroglyphics [3]. Although Kirchner made the assumption that hieroglyphs were phonetic symbols, he was not very successful in their identification and came to interpret hieroglyphs as symbols used by ancient people largely for ideographic writing. This doctrine of hieroglyphic wisdom delayed the decipherment of scripts such as those of the Maya writing system. Michael Coe [3] writes that “the fallacy that hieroglyphic scripts largely consisted of symbols that communicate ideas directly, without the intervention of language, was held as an article of faith by generations of distinguished Maya scholars, including Seler, Schellhas, and Thompson, as well as the multitude of their lesser followers.”

The understanding that hieroglyphs may simply stand for sounds was critical in deciphering Maya inscriptions and texts. Some hieroglyphs represent a phonetic value only. Often, they incorporate both semantic and phonetic elements. Therefore, one typically speaks of semanto-phonetic writing systems: currently used ones (Chinese, Japanese) and no longer used ones (Akkadian,  Chữ-nôm, Egyptian, Jurchen, Khitan, Linear B, Luwian, Mayan, Sumerian, Tangut) [5].

Keywords: linguistics, writing, documenting, anthropology, history, decipherment, code breaking.

References and more to explore
[1] Encyclopedia Britannica: hieroglyph [www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/265009/hieroglyph].
[2] International World History Project: Ancient Egypt, Hieroglyphics [http://history-world.org/hieroglyphics.htm].
[3] Michael D. Coe: Breaking the Maya Code. Thames & Hudson, New York, Revised Edition 1999; page 16, 260, and 288 (Glossary).
[4] The Hieroglyphica of Horapollo. Translated from the Egyptian Tongue and put into Greek by Philip. Now rendered into English [www.masseiana.org/hiero.htm].
[5] Semanto-phonetic writing systems [www.omniglot.com/writing/semanto-phonetic.php].

Acronym in fire ecology: WUI for wildland urban interface

In geography and ecology, WUI  stands for “wildland urban interface,” also written “wildland-urban interface” [1]. This is the belt or zone of transition between urban development and “unoccupied land,” such as forests and wildlife habitats. The WUI itself and adjacent areas on both sides are at high fire risk during dry seasons and conditions of strong winds. 

Wendy Tokuda, a journalist and Oakland hills (California) dweller, writes about efforts of WUI management in the Berkeley-Oakland Hills—an area that is particularly at danger when the dry and warm Diablo winds (named after Mount Diablo, a mountain in Contra Costa County northeast of Danville) are blowing from the east [2,3]. Wildfires can be natural,  but WUI fires are mostly caused by humans; in Tokuda's words [2]:

Almost all of the fires in the so-called “wildland urban interface” (WUI or “wooie,” as some call it) are caused by people. Some are outright arson, but others are started inadvertently with cars, power tools, or burning leaves or debris. Either way, the bottom line is people cause fires, and there are a lot of people in California.

And in Colorada, Arizona, Mexico, Spain, Greece, Turkey, India, China, Australia, ...

Keywords: fire prevention, fire hazard, urban landscaping, firefighting, wooies.

References and more to explore
[1] IAFC - International Association of Fire Chiefs: Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) [www.iafc.org/Education/Events.cfm?itemnumber=4640].
[2] Wendy Tokuda: Taming the flames: Wildland fire in the East Bay Hills. Bay Nature July-September 2012, 46-50.
[3] East Bay Parks: Fire Ecology and Management. Part II in “Jul-Sep 2012 Issue Photo/Artwork Needs Bulletin” [baynature.org/about/image-needs].

Mt. Erebus and Mt. Terror on Ross Island named after ships of an expedition led by Sir James Clark Ross

The two volcanoes Mt. Erebus and Mt. Terror on Ross Island—a volcanic formation in Antarctica's Ross Sea—were named in 1841 by Sir James Clark Ross after his expedition ships H.M.S. Erebus and H.M.S. Terror, respectively. H.M.S. Erebus was named after the Greek god of primeval darkness [1-3].

Mt. Erebus is an active stratovolcano, 12,448 ft (3,794 m) high. It is the most southerly active volcano on Earth. Although one of the coldest spots on our planet, Mt. Erebus also is a hot spot: literally, considering its lava lake and fumaroles; and research-wise, considering the interesting occurrence of mosses and microbes, whose origin still is debated. Mt. Erebus belongs to the Pacific Ring of Fire. The New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology maintains the Mount Erebus Volcano Observatory (MEVO) on Ross Island, next to Scott Base, which is operated by New Zealand to support field research [4,5].

Mt. Erebus' smaller companion, Mt. Terror with an elevation of 10,702 ft (3,262 m), is a (dormant or extinct?) basaltic shield volcano, flanked by cinder cones [6].

Both volcanoes have been listed as spectacular skiing destinations with over 10,000 ft (3,000 m) of vertically skiable slopes for downhill enthusiasts [7]. Olivia Judson, in her Erebus article [1] , describes the heavy outfit that researcher on Ross Island wear to protect themselves from extreme weather conditions. What kind of precautions would skiers take?  Thinking of skiing Mt. Terror downslope, I get terrified! 

Keywords:  earth science, geography, locality names, volcanology, mythology, microbiology, history.

References and more to explore
[1] Olivia Judson: Life in an Icy Inferno. National Geographic July 2012, 222 (1), 94-115 [ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/07/mount-erebus/judson-text].
[2] Encyclopedia Britannica: Ross Island [www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/510133/Ross-Island].
[3] Encyclopedia Mythica: Erebus by Ron Leadbetter [www.pantheon.org/articles/e/erebus.html].
[4] World Organization of Volcano Observatories: Mount Erebus Volcano Observatory [www.wovo.org/1900_02.html].
[5] Antarctica New Zealand: Scott Base [www.antarcticanz.govt.nz/scott-base].
[6] Oregon State/Education: Mount Terror, Ross Island, Antarctica [volcano.oregonstate.edu/vwdocs/volc_images/antarctica/terror.html].
[7] Skiing the Pacific Ring of Fire and Beyond: Mount Erebus [www.skimountaineer.com/ROF/ROF.php?name=Erebus] and  Mount Terror [www.skimountaineer.com/ROF/ROF.php?name=Terror].

From a temporary designator to a recognized chemical element name: ununhexium becomes livermorium

The chemical element with atomic number 116 was until now addressed as ununhexium (Uuh) using the temporary designator and three-letter atomic symbol system recommended by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC).  A few days ago, IUPAC approved the name livermorium to replace the temporary designator ununhexium. The element symbol is Lv.

The name of this synthetic element honors the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, which, along with the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions in Russia, has been involved in the discovery and production of various superheavy elements, including flerovium and livermorium [1].

The most stable isotope known today is livermorium-293, ²⁹³Lv, with has a half-life of about 60 ms. Less stable isotopes include ²⁹²Lv, ²⁹¹Lv and ²⁹⁰Lv [2].

Livermorium's “left neighbor” —the element with atomic number 115, ununpentium, with the temporary symbol Uup—is provisionally named eka-bismuth, since it finds its place below the group 15 (Va) element bismuth in the periodic table. Following this Mendeleev-type notation, livermorium can be considered as eka-polonium (its historical name). Livermorium's “next-to-left neighbor ” with atomic number 114 (formerly ununquadium) is flerovium (Fl). The name flerovium also has just been approved officially by IUPAC [see ununquadium becomes flerovium].

Reference
[1] Adam Mann: 2 New Elements Named on Periodic Table. May 31, 2012 [www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/05/flerovium-livermorium].
[2] Scribd: Livermorium [www.scribd.com/doc/95712552/Livermorium].

From a temporary designator to a recognized chemical element name: ununquadium becomes flerovium

The chemical element with atomic number 114 was until now addressed as ununquadium (Uuq) using the temporary designator and three-letter atomic symbol system recommended by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC).  A few days ago, IUPAC approved the name flerovium to replace the temporary designator ununquadium. The element symbol is Fl.

Mistaking Fl as the symbol for fluorine, which simply is F, should be unlikely, since the latter is in use for so long. Further, flerovium will not play any major role in composing compounds and writing their formulae, because it is a radioactive chemical element with isotopes exhibiting half-lifes of only a few seconds or less.

The name of this synthetic element honors the Russian physicist Georgiy N. Flerov and also the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions in Russia, a facility named after Flerov and known for its production of  various superheavy elements, including flerovium [1].

Flerovium's “left neighbor” —the element with atomic number 113, ununtrium, with the temporary symbol Uut—is provisionally named eka-thallium (no permanent IUPAC-approved name yet), since it finds its place below the group 13 (IIIa) element thallium in the periodic table. Following this Mendeleev-type notation, flerovium can be considered as eka-lead or eka-plumbum. Flerovium's “next-to-left neighbor ” with atomic number 112 (formerly ununbium) is officially named copernicium (Cn) [see naming history of copernicium].

Reference
[1] Adam Mann: 2 New Elements Named on Periodic Table. May 31, 2012 [www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/05/flerovium-livermorium].

A bacterium named after chemical transformations that it supports: Dehalococcoides ethenogenes

Dehalococcoides ethenogenes is an anaerobic, Gram-positive bacterium (phylum: Chloroflexi, class: Dehalococcoidetes)  [1].  Its name, Dehalococcoides ethenogenes, hints at the chemical transformations that it can perform: dehalogenation of halogenated ethene compounds to ethene.

Halogenated solvents such as chlorinated ethenes are environmental pollutants, often with a characteristic of long-term persistence. The discovery that D. ethenogenes can help to convert toxic chemicals into less harmful ones is of interest for the treatment of soil and groundwater, when contaminated with such halogenated hydrocarbons. It has been demonstrated, for example, that D. ethenogenes (strain 195)—transferred into an optimized growth medium—completely decomposes tetrachloroethene by reductive dechlorination [2,3].

An interesting question is if D. ethenogenes evolved in contaminated soil environments and developed the metabolic capability to transform chlorinated hydrocarbons for its own benefit. If so, this would be an example for “natural selection on speed” [4].

Keywords: microbiology, bioremediation, metabolic pathway, reductive dehalogenation, terminology.

References and more to explore
[1] Microbe Wiki: Dehalococcoides ethenogenes [microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/Dehalococcoides_ethenogenes].
[2] X. Maymó-Gatell, Y.-t. Chien, J. M. Gossett and S. H. Zinder: Isolation of a Bacterium That Reductively Dechlorinates Tetrachloroethene to Ethene. Science 1997, 276 (5318), pp. 1568-1571. DOI: 10.1126/science.276.5318.1568. 
[3] X. Maymó-Gatell, T. Anguish and S. H. Zinder: Reductive Dechlorination of Chlorinated Ethenes and 1,2-Dichloroethane by “Dehalococcoides ethenogenes” 195. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1999, 65 (7), pp. 3108-3113 [aem.asm.org/content/65/7/3108.abstract].
[4] Tim Friend: The Third Domain. The Untold Story of Archaea and the Future of Biotechnology. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, D.C., 2007; page 248.